Ranking | |
Views 14 Comparisons 6 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 22 Comparisons 15 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Imperva and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: January 2021. 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
Learn | |
Pulse Secure Video Not Available | SonicWall |
Overview | |
Pulse vWAF delivers scalable application security for off-the-shelf and custom applications, including third-party frameworks. Apply business rules to online traffic, inspect and block attacks such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS), and filter outgoing traffic and data to mask credit card data. Pulse vWAF helps achieve compliance with PCI-DSS requirements. | The SonicWall Web Application Firewal l (WAF) solutions enables the defense-in-depth strategy to protect your web applications running in a private, public or hybrid cloud environment. compromise the application, steal data and/or cause a denial-of-service. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Pulse vWAF | Learn more about SonicWall Web Application Firewall |
Sample Customers | |
Gilt Groupe | AMANZIMTOTI HIGH SCHOOL |
Pulse vWAF is ranked 45th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while SonicWall Web Application Firewall is ranked 44th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Pulse vWAF is rated 0.0, while SonicWall Web Application Firewall is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Pulse vWAF is most compared with , whereas SonicWall Web Application Firewall is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.