Compare Puppet Enterprise vs. Red Hat Satellite

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Puppet Enterprise vs. Red Hat Satellite and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The versatility is great.""Anything that we manage through Puppet always runs perfectly."

More Puppet Enterprise Pros »

"Satellite gives administrators the ability to target deployments and only send out the updates or provision updates to certain groups.""It cuts down significantly on the administrative time it takes to patch systems in a large environment.""Fixing is the most valuable. When you deal with a lot of hardware and software and you have a lot of packages, fixing is a bit difficult. You need to track and pull up all such things, but Satellite makes this task easy. We have branches in other locations, and I can manage other branches by using Satellite Capsule, which is a great feature.""Technical support has been good."

More Red Hat Satellite Pros »

Cons
"There's a lot of scope for enhancement on the DevSecOps side. They should definitely include features for compliance, for both the Linux and Windows side of the devices, as well as for network devices. Compliance is something they need to work on.""It's a bit of a pain point to make sure that everything works once we've upgraded it because Puppet has been evolving pretty fast."

More Puppet Enterprise Cons »

"The product could have more diversity in what it is able to deploy and might do better if it was not dedicated to Red Hat products only.""It has not been significantly updated in a while.""It wasn't easy in the beginning, and some effort was required to work it out. I already had the product documentation, but it was not well organized. It wasn't easy to follow. There were a lot of documents here and there.""There needs to be some margin for improvement in terms of the way Satellite manages subscriptions. It is still very confusing when we have different contracts or different bundles of subscriptions, and we need to manage those within Satellite in a way that's very user-friendly."

More Red Hat Satellite Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The main thing that we noticed when we switched from the enterprise version to the community version was the difference in cost — the infrastructure is pretty expensive."

More Puppet Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing depends on the number of servers.""The cost for a larger enterprise is probably almost always a boon.""Its price is good. They call it subscription, not license, and it is on a yearly basis. There is only one subscription, and that's it."

More Red Hat Satellite Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Anything that we manage through Puppet always runs perfectly.
Top Answer: Puppet was a good product; we used it when we had 200 VMs. When we tried to add Windows servers to it, that's when we realized the price nearly doubled for us because we also have around 200 Windows… more »
Top Answer: The main thing that we noticed when we switched from the enterprise version to the community version was the difference in cost — the infrastructure is pretty expensive. We work in the education… more »
Top Answer: Technical support has been good.
Top Answer: The pricing was reviewed about three years ago. We like the pricing setup as it scales up and down easily, as we are charged by the number of med notes. The pricing is fair. We simply have to pay for… more »
Top Answer: One of the challenges we have at the moment is managing the subscriptions for Red Hat. Apart from managing the patching for the Linux systems, we also use Satellite to manage the subscriptions that… more »
Ranking
10th
Views
3,471
Comparisons
2,219
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
1,210
Rating
8.5
9th
Views
6,434
Comparisons
5,206
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
959
Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Puppet
Learn More
Overview

Puppet Data Center Automation helps sysadmins automate configuration and management of machines and the software running on them. With our software, businesses can make rapid, repeatable changes and automatically enforce the consistency of systems and devices, across physical and virtual machines, on prem or in the cloud.

Red Hat Satellite is a system management solution that makes Red Hat infrastructure easier to deploy, scale, and manage across physical, virtual, and cloud environments. This management tool helps users provision, configure, and update systems to keep them running efficiently, securely, and in compliance with various standards. By automating most system maintenance tasks, Red Hat Satellite helps organizations increase efficiency, reduce operational costs, and enable IT to better respond to strategic business needs.

Offer
Learn more about Puppet Enterprise
Learn more about Red Hat Satellite
Sample Customers
Los Alamos National Laboratory, GitHub, IP Commerce, Cedexis, Spiceworks, Server Density, Swisstopo, Chockstone, Constant Contact, NICS, Citrix
Baloise Bank SoBa, ETH Zurich, Munich Airport, ING-DiBa, Produban
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise22%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Puppet Enterprise vs. Red Hat Satellite and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Puppet Enterprise is ranked 10th in Configuration Management with 2 reviews while Red Hat Satellite is ranked 9th in Configuration Management with 3 reviews. Puppet Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Satellite is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Puppet Enterprise writes "A set-it-and-forget-it management solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Satellite writes "A good product for managing patches and updates that could be more robust and up-to-date". Puppet Enterprise is most compared with SCCM, Ansible, BigFix, UrbanCode Deploy and SaltStack, whereas Red Hat Satellite is most compared with Ansible, HashiCorp Terraform, SCCM and SUSE Manager. See our Puppet Enterprise vs. Red Hat Satellite report.

See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.