Compare Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. SwiftStack

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. SwiftStack and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We can capacity plan at a greater level than we used to.""The initial setup is pretty easy and simple.""We have integrated it with VMware. The integration process is pretty good. Especially with VMware, it helps with the capacity of it.""The most valuable features include the ease of implementation, ease of use and the speed that you can do backup and recovery on.""Using this solution has made our backups more reliable.""The most valuable feature of this solution is performance.""It uses the same platform for connectivity so integration is seamless.""The initial setup is pretty quick."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pros »

"The scalability is phenomenal. It seems infinite, as long as you put enough storage in place, add enough nodes.""It has helped us with the ability to distribute data to different data centers. As part of our DR strategy, we have nodes automatically replicating data from one data center to the other. This makes it easier for us to not have to shift tapes around.""The general consensus on what we've done is that the restores coming back from it have been faster than they were from our prior vendor. Ingest speeds are fine. The restore speeds have improved.""The most valuable feature is its versatility. We use 1space and we can use it for almost anything: for our cloud service, for backups of VMs.""SwiftStack is also quite flexible when it comes to hardware. It depends, of course, on the use case and the kind of hardware you want to buy. But you have quite a bit of choice in hardware. The SwiftStack software itself does not impose anything on you.""The SwiftStack Controller, which is the web UI, provides out of band management. This has been one of the best features of it. It allows us to be able to do upgrades and look at performance metrics. It is a top feature and reason to choose the product."

More SwiftStack Pros »

Cons
"The technical support needs to improve. When we open a case, it is auto assigned to a support tech person. Nine out of ten times, we get an email right back saying that person is off until tomorrow. I cannot handle that. They just did this over the weekend to us, too. I had to call our rep and have them do something about it.""The speed could be improved.""I have not seen ROI.""In terms of scalability, it doesn't expand out quite as robustly as some of the others, but it covers 90% of the market in what it does.""I would like to see more monitoring capability included in the next release of this solution.""I would like to see more VM-Aware features in the next release of this solution.""It's on the expensive side, as expected for a niche product.""Compared to, for example, Hitachi NAS, the solution is not mature at all. It's just in its infancy as far as technology goes."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Cons »

"I would like to see better client integrations, support for a broader client library. SwiftStack could be a little bit more involved in the client side: Python, Java, C, etc.""On the controller features, there needs to be a bit more clean up of the user interface. There are a lot of options available on the GUI which might be better organized or compartmentalized. There are times when you are going through the user interface and you have to look around for where the setting may be. A little bit more attention to the organization of the user interface would be helpful.""They should provide a more concise hardware calculator when you're putting your capacity together.""At the moment we are using Erasure coding in an 8+4 setting. What would be nice is if, for some standard configurations like 15+4 and 8+4, there were more versatility so we could, for example, select 8+6, or the like.""The file access needs improvement. The NFS was rolled out as a single service. It needs to be fully integrated into the proxy in a highly available fashion, like the regular proxy access is. I know it's on the roadmap."

More SwiftStack Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I have seen ROI. It has allowed me to increase the density of my VMs without having to purchase anything additional.""Our licensing is renewed annually.""Support is a separate line item. Support is a different cost, but whatever your support is now, that's what you're going to pay forever. If your support's $100 today, six years from now it's $100. It doesn't fluctuate unless you upgrade it, or change it, etc.""The price is a little high.""In my opinion, we have paid the right price for the product. I don't think that it is too much or too little."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The annual support and maintenance costs compared to our old solution for backups had about a two-thirds savings, so about a 60% annual savings on our support and maintenance contract. That savings funded additional expansion for what it was costing us for the support and maintenance contracts on old solution.""The pricing and licensing are capacity-based, so it's hard to put my finger on them, because so many different vendors charge in different ways. We are still saving significantly over any of the other options that we evaluated because we can choose the best hardware at the best price, then put SwiftStack software on it. So, it's hard to complain, even though a part of me goes, "It would be nicer if it were less expensive."""We have had a 40 to 50 percent reduction in CAPEX on the acquisition of new hardware, which is probably conservative.""COST_SAVING; We have had a 40 to 50 percent reduction in CAPEX on the acquisition of new hardware, which is probably conservative.""We find the pricing rather steep. Of course, you get quality for your money, that's absolutely true... [But] when you look at the prices of the licensing and the prices of your hardware, it's quite substantial.""We are able to dynamically grow storage at a lower cost. We can repurpose hardware and buy commodity hardware. There is a huge cost savings, on average $100,000 a year compared to traditional storage for what we have at our size.""The pricing model is great and makes sense. We have talked about how to get into more of a frequent billing cycle than once a year. That would be an interesting concept to add into the product, having the ability to have monthly billing instead of having to do a one-year licensing renewal. However, the way the license works by charging for storage consumed is definitely what makes them the most competitive.""Dollar per gigabyte, it costs us more because we are storing more. However, if you look at it from a cost per gigabyte perspective, we have dropped our costs significantly."

More SwiftStack Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features are the Metro clustering, and disaster recovery.
Top Answer: In my opinion, we have paid the right price for the product. I don't think that it is too much or too little.
Top Answer: It would be nice if you could store file-based in the same box with the same technology. Now you can only put block storage on the storage array. It would be nice if you had the same features in the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
Views
5,484
Comparisons
3,258
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
421
Rating
8.8
3rd
Views
2,332
Comparisons
1,372
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
1,549
Rating
8.4
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
NVIDIA
Video Not Available
Overview

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

SwiftStack enables you to do more with storage. Store more data, enable more applications and serve more users. We do this by delivering a proven object storage solution that's built on an open-source core and is fully enterprise ready. Our object storage software is an alternative to complex, expensive, on-premises hardware-based storage solutions. SwiftStack delivers the features and flexibility you need to easily manage and scale object storage behind your firewall. Customers are demanding storage where they can pay as they grow, find it is easier to consume, and can infinitely scale. Today, our customers use SwiftStack for archiving active data, serving web content, building private clouds, sharing documents and storing backups.
Offer
Learn more about Pure Storage FlashBlade
Learn more about SwiftStack
Sample Customers
ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
Pac-12 Networks, Georgia Institute of Technology, Budd Van Lines
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm23%
University15%
Pharma/Biotech Company8%
Marketing Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider21%
Manufacturing Company9%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise48%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. SwiftStack and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Pure Storage FlashBlade is ranked 1st in File and Object Storage with 10 reviews while SwiftStack is ranked 3rd in File and Object Storage with 4 reviews. Pure Storage FlashBlade is rated 8.8, while SwiftStack is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Pure Storage FlashBlade writes "An easy to use solution with a straightforward setup and good speed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SwiftStack writes "It has helped us with the ability to distribute data to different data centers". Pure Storage FlashBlade is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Red Hat Ceph Storage, HPE Primera, MinIO and Dell EMC PowerStore, whereas SwiftStack is most compared with MinIO, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Scality RING8 and Cloudian HyperStore. See our Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. SwiftStack report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.