PWC Data and Analytics vs Tom Sawyer Software Graph Database Browser comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
452
Comparisons
400
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
75
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Optimise your data assets. Make faster and better decisions. Work more efficiently and save money. Find new sources of revenue. Capitalise on the untapped business intelligence you already own.

A Graph Database Browser for Everyone
Data scientists, analysts, architects, and developers can use the Tom Sawyer Graph Database Browser to see connections in five unique graph layouts, view social networks, and perform graph analytics. The application supports Amazon Neptune, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, Neo4j, Apache TinkerPop, Cambridge Semantics AnzoGraph DB, and JanusGraph graph databases.

Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm30%
Computer Software Company13%
Educational Organization9%
Insurance Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise74%
No Data Available

PWC Data and Analytics is ranked 4th in Data and Analytics Service Providers while Tom Sawyer Software Graph Database Browser is ranked 23rd in Data and Analytics Service Providers. PWC Data and Analytics is rated 0.0, while Tom Sawyer Software Graph Database Browser is rated 0.0. On the other hand, PWC Data and Analytics is most compared with Palantir Foundry, NTT DATA Data & Intelligence, Accenture Applied Intelligence and EXL Analytics, whereas Tom Sawyer Software Graph Database Browser is most compared with KNIME.

See our list of best Data and Analytics Service Providers vendors.

We monitor all Data and Analytics Service Providers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.