OpenText Silk Central vs QA Touch comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
324 views|224 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
DCKAP Logo
103 views|53 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and QA Touch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."
  • More OpenText Silk Central Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    20th
    Views
    324
    Comparisons
    224
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    28th
    Views
    103
    Comparisons
    53
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
    Learn More
    Overview
    Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

    DCKAP is a digital commerce solution provider. We design, develop, integrate, and implement digital solutions that drive revenue for manufacturers and distributors online.

    Sample Customers
    AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
    BottleStore.com, SALTER LABS, Riddell, GIRO, CONNEC, Blue Sky, BRG SPORTS, New York Institute of Finance
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Transportation Company25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while QA Touch is ranked 28th in Test Management Tools. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while QA Touch is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas QA Touch is most compared with .

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.