Compare QA Touch vs. Silk Central

QA Touch is ranked 32nd in Test Management Tools while Silk Central is ranked 11th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. QA Touch is rated 0, while Silk Central is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Central writes "A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions". QA Touch is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
QA Touch Logo
44 views|32 comparisons
Silk Central Logo
1,486 views|795 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use QA Touch? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
32nd
Views
44
Comparisons
32
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
11th
Views
1,486
Comparisons
795
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,007
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Borland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn
DCKAP
Micro Focus
Overview

DCKAP is a digital commerce solution provider. We design, develop, integrate, and implement digital solutions that drive revenue for manufacturers and distributors online.

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
Offer
Learn more about QA Touch
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
BottleStore.com, SALTER LABS, Riddell, GIRO, CONNEC, Blue Sky, BRG SPORTS, New York Institute of FinanceAmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Software R&D Company29%
Transportation Company14%
Manufacturing Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Financial Services Firm20%
Government15%
Comms Service Provider11%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.