We performed a comparison between QAD Cloud ERP and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."
"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."
"The in-memory processing capability is most valuable."
"It is a very powerful, highly customizable tool."
"I find the Production Planning Cockpit (PPC) and Material Requirements Planning (MRP) most valuable modules."
"The solution makes its use and the management of our infrastructure easy."
"S/4HANA is so much faster today than it was before. High performance is one of the best features, but the backbone of S/4HANA is its integration capabilities. They've also shifted to a focus on user experience."
"One of the most valuable features is the in-memory database."
"S/4HANA falls under a single terminal. We can easily access the data, and the performance is good."
"Responsive, comprehensive and optimized solution."
"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."
"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."
"Planned Order List needs a change of screen."
"The common issues being raised right now by the end users are mostly related to the usability."
"You will not see convenient user experiences with SAP S4HANA's website or application."
"The procure-to-pay solution in the Contract Management angle could be better. If you look at it on Ariba, the Contract Management Life Cycle for Ariba is more robust. You can create documentation, SLAs, and NDAs. Apart from the procurement aspect of the contract, you have the legal side, but Ariba cannot do that. From what I've seen, the features of the procure-to-pay model in S/4HANA and their Contract Life Cycle Management side primarily focus on the procurement side. I believe it would be good if this solution could handle a part of the legal side. They will incorporate Extended Warehouse Management and Transportation Management into the S/4HANA cloud. Most big companies that use a solution like S/4HANA have a legal department within the organization. Suppose they can incorporate that to be in S/4HANA suites; I think it'll be good. It will be just like what we have with Transportation Management and Extended Warehouse Management. The user interface could be better. They have too much information on the interface, and our customers still keep complaining that it looks complex. Even though many things have changed, they still complain that the interface or the screen they see is a bit complex. It's only when they see the Fiori interface that their mind becomes a bit calm."
"Lacking in some customizations."
"I have found the solution to be stable but it could improve."
"The customer service and support are average. There is room for improvement in response time."
"MRP repost area should be improved. The production information report also needs to be improved."
QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 25th in ERP with 2 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
