We performed a comparison between Qlik Sense and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tableau, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization."Some of the valuable areas of this solution include producing individual reports and closing the gap."
"The UI is very easy to use, with drag and drop self-service analytics."
"The product responds fast for data analysis."
"It has improved our organization by providing data to decision-makers in a safe visual environment."
"The associative searching and filtering capability is a unique feature among other BI tools, and one does not need to deeply understand the underlying data."
"This tool not only allows for consumption of the data in a visual way, but also allows the user to modify the question to get new answers."
"The number of visualizations that are present in Qlik is very useful for our developers to help our business partners tell stories with their data. Qlik continues to add to and enhance these visualizations with each release. We are also very excited to leverage the integration between Qlik Sense and Qlik Catalog as we roll that out soon."
"The overall ability to build quick wins with simple data to drive insights."
"Capability to expand the functionality through custom code for data inputs, commands, visualization, alerts, and machine learning."
"My favorite example of improving of organization is saving a $60k/mo in payroll fraud and $10k/mo in wasted API credits by using simple searches and clear reports."
"The solution has made us more secure."
"The correlation capabilities are the first value that our clients say they like with Splunk."
"Splunk is a user-friendly solution."
"Alerts when a server is malfunctioning, monitors external attacks, and takes action to stop spreading viruses."
"It's extremely scalable. It's a very robust solution and certainly has the capability of handling far bigger data requirements than a lot of the other tools. Generally what ends up happening with me is that my clients tend, for the most part, to be mid-tier organizations where the cost of that solutions would be accompanying requirements for people just becomes way too prohibitive. Especially considering the model that they use for costing, which is based on the volume of data. Of course, they're going to put everything including the Coke machine as the ability to collect data off of it, because of course the more they can put through the tool the more money they make."
"We can easily configure things as required in relation to our use cases."
"Moving forward I would like to see more features that are currently available in QlikView, such as being able to better customize coloring within charts. I would also like to see the ability to add calculated dimensions to the selections tool in the page."
"Error handling is an area that needs to be improved."
"Needs more bookmarking and a data load screen."
"Data modelling automation needs improvement."
"There is room for improvement in the storytelling mode and the report sharing. Qlik Sense also does not have a subscription base like Power BI. So a lot of the analysis is housed in community pages that are managed by either the author or a database administrator, or whoever the Qlik Sense manager is there."
"More focus needs to be on data streaming/real-time data reporting."
"Mostly when it comes to the loading of the data and reload times of the reports, it could be better."
"Ability for the administrator to approve Community Sheets in the QMC and then move them into base sheets."
"If possible, we would like to have not only a log monitoring system but a network monitoring feature in this solution as well."
"Splunk could be improved by reducing the cost. The cost is one of the biggest challenges for us in keeping to our production requirements."
"Given the ever-increasing number of threats, I would like Splunk to update its threat signatures more frequently."
"The complexity could be worked on so that it's even easier and faster."
"A lot of people are averse to using new tools so if they make it even more user-friendly than it already is, I think that could go a long way."
"Splunk could enhance its services by providing more comprehensive professional assistance aimed at optimizing our investment."
"The algorithms customization of Splunk could improve. They have limited algorithms for machine learning support. If they can allow the user to add more machine learning algorithms, such as the ability to choose the algorithm that a user might want. Additionally, they should provide the required libraries for those algorithms, and then analyzes the data for use."
"Splunk could add more ways to manage archiving and storage. There isn't a web interface. You can do this on the SaaS version, but the on-premise platform doesn't have this option. It has other things but no option for remote NAS. I would like to have a personal web interface where I can specify how long logs should be stored. To have this readily available on the web, you need to adjust some settings on the backend. That is tricky."
Qlik Sense is ranked 2nd in Data Visualization with 112 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 221 reviews. Qlik Sense is rated 8.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Qlik Sense writes "Customizable with good ROI and a quick learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Qlik Sense is most compared with Tableau, Amazon QuickSight, Microsoft Power BI, Apache Superset and Alteryx, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all Data Visualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.