We performed a comparison between QlikView and RapidMiner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in Reporting."The in-memory feature gives us better insight. It's also easy to drill down into the information and select information."
"We use QlikView for its cost-effectiveness and ease of integration with databases."
"The language support is very good."
"Data transforming with scripting, and the associative model that lets users browse data in an easy way, are the most valuable features."
"The user interface and dashboards are very good."
"It has user-friendly data visualization features, supporting our decision-making process with its business intelligence capabilities"
"The most valuable feature of QlikView is the integration with other third-party tools."
"It's pretty easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of RapidMiner is that it can read a large number of file formats including CSV, Excel, and in particular, SPSS."
"The data science, collaboration, and IDN are very, very strong."
"The most valuable feature is what the product sets out to do, which is extracting information and data."
"The best part of RapidMiner is efficiency."
"I've been using a lot of components from the Strategic Extension and Python Extension."
"It is easy to use and has a huge community that I can rely on for help. Moreover, it is interactive."
"The solution is stable."
"The documentation for this solution is very good, where each operator is explained with how to use it."
"It would be nice if QlikView could be plugged in into the company's website or an online portal such as QlikSense is capable of. There are ways around but it takes enormous time to develop."
"Although Qliktech's road map clearly states that QlikView has a long way to go, most of the R&D effort seems to be benefiting Qlik Sense."
"The only thing I would improve about it is the fact that it refreshes all the time, and when it does that, it just deletes all the options you had, all the filters that you had selected, so you need to select them from the beginning."
"The user interface and ease of use takes a bit of a learning curve to pick up."
"The pricing is high."
"Sometimes the filters are disappearing, and I'm not sure why this is happening."
"They could provide a user-friendly analysis process rather than specialized IT resource code."
"More/newer visualisation components need to be added."
"I think that they should make deep learning models easier."
"RapidMiner can improve deep learning by enhancing the features."
"The server product has been getting updated and continues to be better each release. When I started using RapidMiner, it was solid but not easy to set up and upgrade."
"If they could include video tutorials, people would find that quite helpful."
"I would like to see more integration capabilities."
"RapidMiner isn't cheap. It's a complete solution, but it's costly."
"A great product but confusing in some way with regard to the user interface and integration with other tools."
"I would appreciate improvements in automation and customization options to further streamline processes."
QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews while RapidMiner is ranked 2nd in Predictive Analytics with 19 reviews. QlikView is rated 8.2, while RapidMiner is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RapidMiner writes "Offers good tutorials that make it easy to learn and use, with a powerful feature to compare machine learning algorithms". QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and TIBCO Spotfire, whereas RapidMiner is most compared with KNIME, Alteryx, Dataiku Data Science Studio, Tableau and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
