We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessAnalyzer and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, SAP and others in Process Mining."Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"You can build flows with this product."
"The most valuable feature is that activities are available to us just by clicking the box, so it doesn't require much time to make changes for future requirements."
"There are other automation tools on the market but Uipath is the leader with many capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the capture process. That is really good because it helps you to understand how your process steps work and what you can do to improve them. It helps to make it more visibility and tangibility into what you are doing in terms of the processes."
"The most valuable features of UiPath Process Mining are ease to use, the graphical user interface is good, and the level of detail it will bring on the board is beneficial. We will be able to visualize a wide variety of users, what are the bottlenecks, and where it's taking a long time to process."
"I think once you start using it, it's absolutely vital on a project. It's truly one of the most helpful things for a project."
"My experience with scalability was good."
"One of the reasons we have gone with UiPath is because it was a business decision and because our company subscribes to the UiPath automation suite, which includes RPA, etc. We thought it would be efficient to keep everything on the same platform."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"UiPath could improve on how it works with the project management process and flow."
"I would like for user onboarding/onboarding of enterprise clients to be simplified in the next release."
"I would like to see better integration with the Azure and AWS machine learning platforms."
"It would be helpful if licensing costs were reduced."
"I would like a few tutorials that explain step by step how to start, including a few tips for new users."
"I have found UiPath Process Mining to be a very complex tool to use. They could improve the OCR recognition feature."
"The remote desktop we utilize suffers from inconsistent performance, sometimes functioning well and other times not."
"In an upcoming release, they could improve on the customization."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 11th in Process Mining while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.0, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with Celonis and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ and Minit.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.