We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."
"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."
"This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."
"The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview."
"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."
"I really like the Collaboration Hub because it's so easy to communicate. And what is really important is that you can use it asynchronously. It doesn't matter if you're working in Italy or in America. You are using the same process and you can speak about the same process."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."
"It's very user-orientated, which is why I gave it a high rating, even if it is not perfect in every corner."
"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."
"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."
"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."
"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 57 reviews. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
