We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and adaptability of Sparx Enterprise Architect."
"The profiles allow me to customize the tool to the corporate environment instead of the other way around saving huge amounts of time and energy on trying to turn dozens of individuals into TOGAF, ArchiMate or Zachman experts, or even Sparx EA experts."
"It provides good utilization and it's a convenient tool for building exact architectural work."
"It's like a repository. So far, we use it only for Information Modelling."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Its most valuable feature is the Zachman Framework."
"The advantages of Enterprise are that it's cheaper and much more practical than MagicDraw."
"It's a very practical solution. You don't need to do an advanced course to start using this tool."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"Weak in regards to data modelling. No logical or physical modelling or migration from conceptual to physical."
"It would be nice to have it supported on the Linux operating system."
"The solution's interface could be more straightforward."
"It really did not work for logical modeling. The look is very old-fashioned. You can't make the diagrams easy on the eye, so we ended up drawing them again in Visio anyhow."
"The elements of the modeling sets can have better customization and visual representation. It would be great to have a mobile version."
"The documentation needs a bit of improvement. What I find is that when I'm trying to do something specific for some part of a project, in terms of documentation, it's kind of hard to get at figuring out if you don't use it all the time."
"There used to be that feature in ArchiMate Modeling of Enterprise Architect called inherited relationships. Now it's gone."
"It should be made Windows compatible."
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 97 reviews. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Easy to set up and had no issues with stability, but it's not a very friendly tool, and its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, Visio, No Magic MagicDraw, Lucidchart and LeanIX.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
