We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and Visual Paradigm based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design."​Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"Using the Component Diagram, Visual Paradigm helps with design and control, reusing components."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup was straightforward."
"Some of the most valuable features of this process modeling tool are process simulation and process animation."
"It is a scalable solution since it can be used at an individual level as well as for enterprise-sized businesses."
"Visual Paradigm is super user-friendly, especially for new team members. I always have them start with it because the interface is so simple to pick up. They usually spend about six months to a year using only Visual Paradigm before moving on to other tools. We also use the cloud repository for collaborative work, but I've had some trouble with code reviewing and limitations. Sometimes, customers even request the source file or exported XML because it's easier for them to access and review."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Paradigm is the ability to design form flows, add libraries, create organizational charts, and connect them all together."
"The solution is stable. It hasn't crashed, stopped or caused any issues in any way."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"The solution is not user-friendly. It uses a lot of memory and CPU. You have to have a good computer to use it."
"There is room for improvement in the licensing model. I would suggest implementing country-specific pricing, as many other products in India do. This would make Visual Paradigm more affordable and accessible."
"Visual Paradigm is heavier and has more complexity than one of its competitors, e.g. Lucidchart. It could have been better if it was more simplified."
"Visual Paradigm's initial deployment was difficult since we did it for the first time. It is challenging to learn to use the product."
"Takes up a lot of resources."
"The solution could be more compatible with other products in the future."
"I would like to see something for visualizing innovation work maps."
"The product's versioning capability needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while Visual Paradigm is ranked 7th in Business Process Design with 25 reviews. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while Visual Paradigm is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Paradigm writes "Very flexible and easy to use with a good pricing model". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas Visual Paradigm is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, Lucidchart, Bizagi and No Magic MagicDraw.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.