We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while WorkflowGen is ranked 28th in Business Process Design. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
