We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"Sparx technical support is good."
"Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect supports multiple modeling languages like ArchiMate for database design, software lifecycle visualization, and team management."
"Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is very flexible and it is simple to define the metamodel. Additionally, it is lightweight on resources."
"Its ease of use and the breadth of the toolkit are most valuable. It has an incredible repository of artifacts to work with, and they're all cross-referenced. It works with a whole bunch of different standards. It works with BPMN, which is Business Process Modeling Notation, and it also works with something called TOGAF, which is the Open Group Architecture Foundation. There are different layers when you're dealing with architecture. There is the user interface, application, data, data servers, and all that kind of stuff. You have the infrastructure, hardware, and software layers, and then you have the application and business capability layers. You can model a business process and decompose it into all of the applications, data, and hardware to support it."
"The stability has been good and satisfactory. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The installation was very easy."
"It is a very flexible product. It can do a lot. It is also a reliable product."
"The features I find most valuable is the ability to create a document and then put it into a OneCare artifact."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"Its best features are not intuitive or easy to learn. Most companies I have worked with, when I see what they are doing with it , are not using more than 5% of what they could and should be doing with it."
"I have found the solution is lacking options. The general usability needs improvement and more compliance to CML definitions."
"The reporting needs improvement."
"It would be great if we could decrease the use of different parts of the Toolbox."
"I struggled with most of the features for this tool, as did the rest of our architecture team."
"Their technical support is not good in India. I wrote to them because I had a question, but I never got an answer. So, I just left it behind."
"The solution needs to offer better support for the mobile-based system. Right now, it's not working."
"It would be nice to have it supported on the Linux operating system."
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 97 reviews. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Easy to set up and had no issues with stability, but it's not a very friendly tool, and its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, Visio, No Magic MagicDraw, Lucidchart and LeanIX.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.