We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and TIBCO Nimbus Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"​Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It tends to get more engagement from people across the business."
"It helps clients find information when they need to know how to do their jobs effectively."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"This product could probably do with less features rather than more. It is overly complicated. In recent releases, it has become harder to use."
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while TIBCO Nimbus Control is ranked 22nd in Business Process Design. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while TIBCO Nimbus Control is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Nimbus Control writes "It is overly complicated. It tends to get more engagement from people across the business". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas TIBCO Nimbus Control is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, Visio and ARIS BPA.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
