QPR ProcessDesigner vs Visual Paradigm comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
QPR Software Logo
196 views|141 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Visual Paradigm Logo
6,455 views|4,134 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and Visual Paradigm based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"​Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas.""It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."

More QPR ProcessDesigner Pros →

"The solution is very user-friendly. It's easy to just open it and start working.""The application is easy to use and provides informative diagrams.""Visual Paradigm is super user-friendly, especially for new team members. I always have them start with it because the interface is so simple to pick up. They usually spend about six months to a year using only Visual Paradigm before moving on to other tools. We also use the cloud repository for collaborative work, but I've had some trouble with code reviewing and limitations. Sometimes, customers even request the source file or exported XML because it's easier for them to access and review.""Some of the most valuable features of this process modeling tool are process simulation and process animation.""Using the Component Diagram, Visual Paradigm helps with design and control, reusing components.""I like the structure. I can see the diagrams and everything I created.""Stable design software with multiple functions and features. It's simple to install and easy to use.""The Visual Paradigm business process forms for designing we good. There was not a lot of configuration for the process diagram."

More Visual Paradigm Pros →

Cons
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."

More QPR ProcessDesigner Cons →

"The user interface is not easy to navigate, so it should be made easier.""The solution is not user-friendly. It uses a lot of memory and CPU. You have to have a good computer to use it.""I was looking to generate code from the diagrams, but it was not totally clear how to do it.""Visual Paradigm is much better now. But each project has its own challenges, which is why I'm exploring different tools for my new projects. For instance, designing reports can be tough, especially with the costly intervention of professional services from vendors.""The solution can be heavy on resource usage.""There are some connectivity issues that crop up rarely when used with SQL Server.""In terms of room for improvement in Visual Paradigm, I tried looking for one. I'm pleased with the tool, but it would be great if you could integrate Visual Paradigm with more tools. For example, when moving from Visual Paradigm to another tool, such as Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, the process could be improved a bit. Still, I wonder if it's not limited by the standards Visual Paradigm follows, such as XMI files. It could be connected to limitations related to the standards rather than a tool limitation. When you move projects from Visual Paradigm into Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect via XMI files, you lose all your notes from the elements, so this is an area for improvement in Visual Paradigm. TOGAF support is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Visual Paradigm. I'd also like the tool to have ArchiMate support. If both TOGAF and ArchiMate could be supported in Visual Paradigm and made part of a lower level of licensing or cheaper licensing models, that would be best for me.""Visual Paradigm's initial deployment was difficult since we did it for the first time. It is challenging to learn to use the product."

More Visual Paradigm Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Over the years I've seen an increase in price, and it makes it difficult for a single person company, like me, to decide whether to extend the license."
  • "You can use Paradigm on a subscription basis and you can choose from different tiers of subscription."
  • "You can move between the tiers from month to month so you are not restricted to one pricing model."
  • "The pricing of Visual Paradigm is very appropriate and affordable. There are no hidden costs involved."
  • "This product is fairly cheap, but if you want more complex features, e.g. integration with other products, it does require an additional cost."
  • "Visual Paradigm has two models available. One of them is the educational edition, and another is the business edition. For my personal usage, I use the educational version mostly. In a project, my customers have to purchase a license."
  • "Visual Paradigm costs $99 per license. I chose the cheapest option from the pricing list."
  • "Pricing for Visual Paradigm is a four out of five for me. I'm happy with its pricing."
  • More Visual Paradigm Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features are pricing and functionality.
    Top Answer:Visual Paradigm's initial deployment was difficult since we did it for the first time. It is challenging to learn to use the product.
    Ranking
    25th
    Views
    196
    Comparisons
    141
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    Views
    6,455
    Comparisons
    4,134
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide
    Learn More
    Visual Paradigm
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.
    Visual Paradigm is a UML tool. The tool is designed for a wide range of users including software engineers, system analysts, business analysts and system architects, or for anyone who is interested in reliably building large-scale software systems using an object-oriented approach. In addition, Visual Paradigm supports the latest standards of UML notation.
    Sample Customers
    ALPLA
    Adobe, Apple, at&t, Caterpillar, Intel, NASA, Nokia, Toyota
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization10%
    University10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Design
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while Visual Paradigm is ranked 7th in Business Process Design with 25 reviews. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while Visual Paradigm is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Paradigm writes "Very flexible and easy to use with a good pricing model". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Visual Paradigm is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, Lucidchart, Bizagi and No Magic MagicDraw.

    See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.