We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"In general, I would say that the API set is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium is how easy it is to automate."
"The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures."
"The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security."
"I like its simplicity."
"It's easy for new people to get trained on this solution. If we are hiring new people, the resource pool in the market in test automation is largely around Selenium."
"The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way."
"I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers."
"Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code."
"For people that don't know about technology, maybe it's difficult to use."
"It takes such a long time to use this solution that it may be worth looking into other free solutions such as TestProject or Katalon Studio, or paid solutions to replace it."
"There is no good tool to find the Xpath. They should provide a good tool to find Xpath for dynamic elements and integrate API (REST/ SOAP) testing support."
"They should add more functionality to the solution."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and OpenText UFT One, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Telerik Test Studio, Worksoft Certify, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText Silk Test.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.