We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and SmartBear LoadNinja based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"SmartBear LoadNinja is easy to use and implement."
"We are happy with the technical support."
"It's a very simple tool for performance testing."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"On a smaller scale, there will be no budget issues, but as we expand to a larger user base, I believe we will face some pricing challenges."
"As we ran the test, we couldn't see the real-time results of how the solution behaved for 200 to 400 virtual users."
"It needs time to mature."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while SmartBear LoadNinja is ranked 14th in Performance Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while SmartBear LoadNinja is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear LoadNinja writes "Easy to use with good documentation and helpful support". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText UFT One, whereas SmartBear LoadNinja is most compared with Apache JMeter, ReadyAPI Performance, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and Tricentis NeoLoad.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.