Compare Quality Center vs. Worksoft Certify

Quality Center is ranked 6th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews. Quality Center is rated 9.0, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Quality Center writes "We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Our automation tests are more robust than our manual tests". Quality Center is most compared with TFS, UFT (QTP) and IBM Rational Quality Manager, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UFT (QTP) and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quality Center Logo
4,752 views|3,367 comparisons
Worksoft Certify Logo
10,881 views|3,258 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: October 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needsBy using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.The enhanced dashboards capabilities are useful for senior management to view the progress of releases under the portfolio in one go and also drill down to the graphs.By standardizing our template, we publish reports at the business unit level.

Read more »

With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient.It is a pretty easy tool to use as far as automated testing tools go.We are now trying to automate all our applications: SAP, web, third-party, and legacy. Instead of multiple tools, we have been able to have Worksoft handle a lot of our applications. This has saved us a lot of time and effort.People who don't have coding knowledge are capable of doing automation with Certify. It reduces coding and scripting dependencies.Our business users are doing regression testing as their day job. This is an add-on to their daily work. With everything so pressured in the industry, automation takes the pressure of these users.It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing.Worksoft has helped us position our company better because the product lets us show our value in terms of the benefits that we bring.Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success.

Read more »

Cons
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.We would like to have support for agile development.

Read more »

It would be great if our business testers could develop their own automated test cases. With every release you do, you have to go back and touch your old test cases and bring them up to speed, or develop new test cases. In the beginning, that is a challenge because you have to have someone who is certified in the tool to help you develop these test cases.Technical support's first response to us is usually late.Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming.One feature that could be added to Capture 2.0 is generating a PDF file from your capture, so you can see your screenshots and steps.The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably.There have been some previous security concerns with the way that Capture has worked. When you turn it on, you don't know what it's capturing. This has raised some concerns in the past, especially in our European regions.The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues.The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.I feel that the licenses are expensive. ‚ÄčIt has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.

Read more »

There is a cost involved to doing it, but once you get over the initial cost, then you'll start reaping the benefits and seeing that testing is getting done more quickly and efficiently. We are still early on with it, but the expectation and what we're seeing is that we will start seeing some savings coming out on the back-end once we have this done.The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP.We no longer need ten people sitting and manually testing something. We can just have one person running the entire regression automation testing suite, and this has saved us dollars.The license cost is quite high. This might not be a consideration for a large company, but it will be for a small company. E.g., Tricentis (their competitor) offers certain exclusive use cases where a company can use it in a certain way, so this is another option that companies consider.Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time.We saved $1.3 million using Worksoft Certify in 2017.Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product.This solution has enabled our clients to automate and save time (approximately 40 to 50 percent).

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
Views
4,752
Comparisons
3,367
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
458
Avg. Rating
9.0
1st
Views
10,881
Comparisons
3,258
Reviews
30
Average Words per Review
1,253
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality Center
Learn
Micro Focus
Worksoft
Overview

Test more, test faster.

Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.

Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.

Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Offer
Learn more about Quality Center
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Sample Customers
Quality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan.Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company17%
Financial Services Firm13%
Media Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Healthcare Company23%
Software R&D Company21%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm10%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Consumer Goods13%
Pharma/Biotech Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Manufacturing Company13%
Media Company10%
Pharma/Biotech Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise91%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise93%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: October 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email