QualiWare X vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between QualiWare X and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Gavin Bérubé
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the solution's traceability."

More QualiWare X Pros →

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.""For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with.""The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature.""The scheduling and the calendar are very useful.""It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pros →

Cons
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

More QualiWare X Cons →

"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back.""The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The maintenance of the package could be improved.""The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily.""Technical support needs to be streamlined."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."
  • More QualiWare X Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."
  • "TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."
  • More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the solution's traceability.
    Top Answer:I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive.
    Top Answer:The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling.
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
    Top Answer:The product fails to offer good integration with REST, making it an area where improvements are required. The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company for case management and business process management. In general, there are two kinds of use cases attached to the product. For case management, you need to have… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    127
    Comparisons
    78
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    223
    Rating
    6.0
    Views
    776
    Comparisons
    579
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    622
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.
    TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.
    Sample Customers
    Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD
    ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government32%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Media Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    QualiWare X is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is ranked 30th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. QualiWare X is rated 7.6, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM writes "A tool backed by stellar support that has helped me plan workflows easily". QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, iServer, ARIS Cloud and Avolution ABACUS, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, TIBCO iProcess Suite, Appian and IBM BPM.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.