We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The biggest benefit is from a security operations perspective, where we are able to drive our security posture upwards by remediating any discovered vulnerabilities."
"It's a good product. After the scan our internet works well. It scans our security posture."
"The process of defining and discovering scans is organized efficiently."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"The prioritization feature is great. I think it has all of the advanced features that we need."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives."
"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
"Tenable SC is good for reporting and alerting. The filtering feature is also very valuable. Its integration with multiple vendors is quite good. It can be integrated with SIEM solutions and PAM solutions such as Thycotic, which is very helpful."
"It basically reviews our threat landscape vulnerability."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements."
"Initial setup was pretty straightforward."
"Very customizable with a lot of templates."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"We face issues while scanning multiple assets."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"The reporting and the GUI need improvements."
"If anything, I would like to see the user interface modernized a bit more."
"I would like to have CSPM, a continuous scan-like cloud added to the solution."
"The customer support is very bad."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved."
"Tenable's reporting engine needs improvement. It needs to be more efficient and add more features."
"The reporting needs a lot of work on the template."
"The solution is expensive."
"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."
"Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
"The solution is expensive."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 76 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 47 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "Reliable, useful reports, but initial report configuration could improve". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Horizon3.ai and Tanium. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.