Anonymous UserIT Consultant Supervisor at a financial services firm
DimitrisMakrisInformation Security Architect at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Technical support is fantastic."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."
"What I like about Qualys VM is the dashboard presentation. It's very good."
"It's a good product. After the scan our internet works well. It scans our security posture."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The initial setup was good. We didn't have any problems with it."
"Technical support is great and we've never really had a problem."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"It's quite complex on the way it is set up, so it takes a fair bit of time in order to get your head around it in order to deploy it. Once you've deployed it, then you're never confident on the versions of the browsers and the SSL certificates, etc. You have to always go back into Qualys and check."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
"The customer support is very bad."
"The reporting needs improvement. It should generate much more stuff like field reports."
"Sometimes we face a problem with accessing the tool and not getting an expected result. From a technology point of view, they need to look into this."
"The ability to manage user accounts and give rights to the operator to know about abnormalities of applications is something that needs improvement."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"They have recently changed the pricing model, which is now better than it was before."
"It is different for every company, but for us, it's every three years."
"Qualys is cheaper and more affordable than other solutions."
"The pricing and licensing for Qualys could be improved."
"I believe the price compares well within the market."
Earn 20 points
Qualys Vulnerability Management (VM) is a cloud-based service that gives you immediate, global visibility into where your IT systems might be vulnerable to the latest Internet threats and how to protect them. It helps you to continuously identify threats and monitor unexpected changes in your network before they turn into breaches.
Tripwire IP360 delivers risk-based vulnerability assessment and asset discovery capabilities. With IP360, you get:
Qualys VM is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 12 reviews while Tripwire IP360 is ranked 9th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews. Qualys VM is rated 8.2, while Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Qualys VM writes "Easy to use and scalable but needs to be priced more competitively". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tripwire IP360 writes "Helps us prioritize vulnerabilities but the dashboard and reporting need to improve". Qualys VM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable SC, Rapid7 InsightVM, Darktrace and Zscaler Internet Access, whereas Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable SC, Trend Micro Deep Security, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Symantec Data Center Security. See our Qualys VM vs. Tripwire IP360 report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.