We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"It's stable and quite reliable."
"I like that we have many scanners and channels that don't overload. It helps us scan and track easily. Also, the tagging system is good for tagging. We can still use QualysAgent task ID tools even if tags aren't made."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the external channel."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"Provides great functionality."
"Tech support is helpful."
"Qualys VM had a recent upgrade and the newer version is supporting the cloud."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"Endpoint stability and fault resolution could be improved."
"The reporting needs improvement. It should generate much more stuff like field reports."
"It is a struggle to be able to pull our report and to be able to do onboarding using automated tools."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"The ability to manage user accounts and give rights to the operator to know about abnormalities of applications is something that needs improvement."
"The customer support is very bad."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 37th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
