Quantivate vs RiskRecon comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quantivate Logo
28 views|17 comparisons
RiskRecon Logo
823 views|660 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Quantivate and RiskRecon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
30th
Views
28
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
823
Comparisons
660
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
IT Vendor Risk Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Quantivate
Video Not Available
Overview

Since 2005, Quantivate has been helping organizations efficiently manage their governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) initiatives. Quantivate’s scalable software and service solutions equip organizations of all sizes to make more strategic decisions, improve performance, and reduce costs. Quantivate’s solutions are used by leading organizations in multiple industries such as financial services, energy, healthcare, technology, manufacturing, non-profits, state & local governments, and retail.

RiskRecon provides a SaaS platform that helps organizations more effectively manage the risk reality of increasingly interconnected IT ecosystems by delivering frequent, comprehensive and actionable security performance measurements.

Using proprietary data gathering techniques, RiskRecon creates a 360-degree risk profile of an enterprise's public IT footprint. Based on that footprint and a detailed analysis, a RiskRecon rating and report is generated providing detailed, actionable information with context. No additional analysis is required.

Clients rely on RiskRecon to bring greater transparency, accountability and productivity to their vulnerability and third-party risk management processes. And, they trust that RiskRecon's continuous monitoring solution employs only ethical techniques - no proprietary vendor data, no permissions and no invasive scans.

Sample Customers
ACU, sunmark, docufree, UBB
Informatica, Arrow, Tufts Health Plan, Sentara, Nacco Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company9%
Healthcare Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise65%
Buyer's Guide
IT Vendor Risk Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quantivate is ranked 30th in IT Vendor Risk Management while RiskRecon is ranked 9th in IT Vendor Risk Management. Quantivate is rated 0.0, while RiskRecon is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Quantivate is most compared with , whereas RiskRecon is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, Black Kite and OneTrust GRC.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.