Quest SharePlex vs webMethods

Quest SharePlex is ranked 3rd in Other Data Integration and Access Tools with 1 review vs webMethods which is ranked 1st in Other Data Integration and Access Tools with 17 reviews. The top reviewer of Quest SharePlex writes "For core replication its performance is the fastest, and replication to multiple targets is also efficient". The top reviewer of webMethods writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". Quest SharePlex is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, JumpMind SymmetricDS and Attunity Replicate. webMethods is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentaho Data Integration vs webMethods and others in Other Data Integration and Access Tools.
288,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Quest SharePlex vs webMethods

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The core replication and its performance. Performance was crucial and, as such, SharePlex is by far the fastest.

Read more »

We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed.I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well.Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API.It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console.I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods.

Read more »

Cons
For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison.

Read more »

We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods.The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that.The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution.​Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools.Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems.This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client.Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.It is worth the cost.Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Other Data Integration and Access Tools solutions are best for your needs.
288,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
5,237
Comparisons
3,290
Reviews
1
Followers
459
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
18,352
Comparisons
10,812
Reviews
16
Followers
995
Avg. Rating
7.9
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 54% of the time.
See more Quest SharePlex competitors »
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
See more webMethods competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsDell SharePlex, SharePlex
Website/Video
Website/VideoQuest Software
Software AG
Overview
Overview

Creates and maintains a fault tolerant replica of your Oracle database and file systems.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

OFFER
Learn more about Quest SharePlex
Learn more about webMethods
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersBodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK BroadbandFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Transportation Company
8%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
11%
Large Enterprise
89%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
8%
Large Enterprise
76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentaho Data Integration vs webMethods and others in Other Data Integration and Access Tools.
Download now
288,256 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Other Data Integration and Access Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email