QuickBase vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quickbase Logo
2,949 views|1,450 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
1,047 views|884 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between QuickBase and SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge.""I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures.""Allows users have anytime/anywhere access.""This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data.""QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support.""It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us.""It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments.""We have made good use of the ability in QuickBase to add multiple apps for various departments and purposes, while some apps are shared."

More QuickBase Pros →

"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable.""SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Pros →

Cons
"I would like the product to add more working processes.""Whenever we do onboarding, or we get new employees, there tends to be a delay of not just a week but a couple of weeks, and sometimes even a few weeks of being able to see certain new employees in the system.""I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate.""Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard.""Third-party integration -- they are working on it and I find their brand-new still-in-beta Webhooks very promising.""The dashboard is not organized.""I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen.""It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."

More QuickBase Cons →

"The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously.""It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."
  • "We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."
  • "Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."
  • "You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."
  • "It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."
  • "The product is cheap when compared to other products."
  • "The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."
  • "The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."
  • More QuickBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect.
    Top Answer:The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year. As for data volume, there is a different pricing model once you… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. Simplifying the system's interface could make it less intimidating for some users who might find the current setup a bit overwhelming due… more »
    Top Answer:The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of… more »
    Top Answer:We use it for end-to-end project management as per the received requirements. There is a customized module called the Project Management System (PMS) where we receive the requirements. Once a… more »
    Top Answer:SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,949
    Comparisons
    1,450
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    1,047
    Comparisons
    884
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    945
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Quick Base, TSheets
    Portfolio and Project Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

    Portfolio Management integrates information from existing project management, human resources, and financial systems to provide an overview of the project portfolio with easy drilldown to details for portfolio managers, project managers, and resource managers. This enables innovative and collaborative, cross-functional business processes. Project Management covers the entire range of project management activities in development and consultancy projects, from planning to implementation to project completion.
    Sample Customers
    Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
    Joy Global Inc., Citrix, EMC Corporation, Concho Resources, Concho Resources, RZD Russian Railways, Family Dollar Stores Inc., Lenovo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Construction Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization69%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Insurance Company3%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business51%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise71%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    QuickBase is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 73 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews. QuickBase is rated 9.0, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "End-to-end project management capabilities and offers seamless vendor and client contract alignment". QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Fusion Service, Sales Creatio, OutSystems and Mendix, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, Jira, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Asana and Planisware.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.