Quip vs XWiki SAS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quip Logo
384 views|343 comparisons
XWiki Logo
58 views|48 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Quip and XWiki SAS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
384
Comparisons
343
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
58
Comparisons
48
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Quip
Video Not Available
Overview
Quip is a team collaboration solution which combines document and spreadsheet creation and editing with chat and commenting capabilities, to allow teams to communicate about tasks and projects directly while working on them.

XWiki is a powerful Open Source knowledge management platform that helps businesses save time and budget while enhancing collaboration on both team and organizational levels. It allows users across different departments to stay on the same page by accessing critical information in a fast and efficient way. Email overload, the loss of important knowledge when key employees leave are long forgotten and silos are reduced. With XWiki, vital information is only a click away, training and operations costs are reduced and data loss is prevented through regular backups. 

XWiki is developed thinking of extensibility, adaptability, and flexibility. It comes with over 750 apps and extensions and allows for endless customization. Moreover, App Within Minutes allows even non-technical users to create their own extensions to address specific needs with custom solutions and continue collaborating efficiently. Because every business is different, XWiki is available both on-premise and Cloud, and, since there is no vendor lock-in, switching between the two is possible at any time.

Sample Customers
Fender, Twitch, Pinterest, Ultimate Software, New Relic, Facebook, Path, Larry Miller Companies, Kent Moore Cabinets, Taser, Zomato, Quora, Wealthfront, Benchmark, Greylock, Stripe, CNN, FiftyThree, Artivest, Trinity Valley School (edu), Delectable, Jack, NW stage, Average Joes Entertainment, Circa, Instacart, Mode Analytics, Clara, Assist, Remind, Airtable, Lean In, Famous, Al Jazeera,
Amazon, Lenovo,  EMC, Cap Gemini, Crédit Mutuel Arkea, Brabantia, Électricité de France, Aelia, Energisa, Meetic, Chronopost. More references: http://www.xwiki.com/en/refere...
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Outsourcing Company10%
Manufacturing Company8%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise53%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quip is ranked 14th in Content Collaboration Platforms while XWiki SAS is ranked 13th in Knowledge Management Software. Quip is rated 0.0, while XWiki SAS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Quip is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs and Slack, whereas XWiki SAS is most compared with Atlassian Confluence.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.