Anonymous UserDevSecOps Consultant at a comms service provider
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works."
"They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey."
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization."
"I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good."
"Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."
"If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."
"Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."
"We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.
The Seeker solution helps businesses find high-risk security weaknesses while fostering collaboration between development and security teams. It exposes vulnerable code and ties it directly to business impact and exploitation scenarios, providing a clear explanation of risks. By accelerating adoption of security testing technologies into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), customers across industries such as financial, health, energy and retail can get to market faster with increased stability and certainty.
Resolving the Blind-Spot: Ongoing Risk Mitigation
Meet the first Website-Sandbox and cover your third-party blindness
Reflectiz provides an advanced website security solution, allowing organizations to stay protected against breaches like - client-side attacks, data leakages and privacy violations, caused by embedded third-party code on their websites.
With enhanced third-party on-going inventory and behavioral analysis for your website, Reflectiz covers even the most undetected vulnerabilities and risks, providing you maximum visibility.
Reflectiz offers a fully automated and dedicated process that protects your website and seamlessly analyzes it. The monitoring process is completely transparent and has no effect on website performance.
Quotium Seeker is ranked 32nd in Application Security while Reflectiz is ranked 46th in Application Security. Quotium Seeker is rated 0.0, while Reflectiz is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Quotium Seeker is most compared with Contrast Security Assess, whereas Reflectiz is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Security vendors.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.