Quotium Seeker vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotium Logo
104 views|75 comparisons
Spirent Logo
185 views|117 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Quotium Seeker and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Quotium Seeker?
Haider Jarral
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    104
    Comparisons
    75
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    185
    Comparisons
    117
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Seeker
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Seeker solution helps businesses find high-risk security weaknesses while fostering collaboration between development and security teams. It exposes vulnerable code and ties it directly to business impact and exploitation scenarios, providing a clear explanation of risks. By accelerating adoption of security testing technologies into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), customers across industries such as financial, health, energy and retail can get to market faster with increased stability and certainty.

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    El Al
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Quotium Seeker is ranked 56th in Application Security Tools while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. Quotium Seeker is rated 0.0, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". Quotium Seeker is most compared with , whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.