Quotium Seeker vs. w3af Comparison

Sponsored
Veracode Read 21 Veracode reviews. 70,664 views\|37,885 comparisons	Quotium Seeker 207 views\|145 comparisons	w3af 877 views\|617 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Anonymous User

DevSecOps Consultant at a comms service provider

By using Pipeline Scan, which supports synchronous scans, our code is secure

Before, the pentesting was happening at later part of the SDLC. Now, we have been getting early feedback about insights from Veracode, including... Read more »

Use Quotium Seeker? Share your opinion.

Use w3af? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive." More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »	Information Not Available	Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx? Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more » Read all 6 answers Would you recommend Veracode? What are some of your use cases? Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more » Read all 3 answers Checkmarx vs SonarQube; SonarQube interoperability with Checkmarx or Veracode Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more » Read all 3 answers	Ask a question Earn 20 points	Ask a question Earn 20 points
Popular Comparisons
SonarQube vs. Veracode Compared 50% of the time. Checkmarx vs. Veracode Compared 16% of the time. Micro Focus Fortify on Demand vs. Veracode Compared 6% of the time. Coverity vs. Veracode Compared 4% of the time. Klocwork vs. Veracode Compared 3% of the time. See more Veracode competitors » + Add more products to compare	Contrast Security Assess vs. Quotium Seeker Compared 100% of the time. See more Quotium Seeker competitors » + Add more products to compare	PortSwigger Burp vs. w3af Compared 58% of the time. Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner vs. w3af Compared 20% of the time. WhiteSource vs. w3af Compared 16% of the time. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs. w3af Compared 6% of the time. See more w3af competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
	Seeker
Learn
Veracode	Quotium	w3af Video Not Available
Overview
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.	The Seeker solution helps businesses find high-risk security weaknesses while fostering collaboration between development and security teams. It exposes vulnerable code and ties it directly to business impact and exploitation scenarios, providing a clear explanation of risks. By accelerating adoption of security testing technologies into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), customers across industries such as financial, health, energy and retail can get to market faster with increased stability and certainty.	w3af is a Web Application Attack and Audit Framework. The project's goal is to create a framework to help you secure your web applications by finding and exploiting all web application vulnerabilities. Our framework is proudly developed using Python to be easy to use and extend, and licensed under GPLv2.0.
Offer
Learn more about Veracode Learn More	Learn more about Quotium Seeker Learn More	Learn more about w3af Learn More
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner	El Al	Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm32% Insurance Company11% Computer Software Company8% Engineering Company5% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company35% Comms Service Provider16% Financial Services Firm8% Manufacturing Company5%	No Data Available	No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business22% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise53% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business20% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise56%	No Data Available	No Data Available

Quotium Seeker is ranked 32nd in Application Security while w3af is ranked 26th in Application Security. Quotium Seeker is rated 0.0, while w3af is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Quotium Seeker is most compared with Contrast Security Assess, whereas w3af is most compared with PortSwigger Burp, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner, WhiteSource and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning.

See our list of best Application Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sponsored
Veracode Read 21 Veracode reviews. 70,664 views\|37,885 comparisons	Quotium Seeker 207 views\|145 comparisons	w3af 877 views\|617 comparisons

Compare Quotium Seeker vs. w3af