We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare RadView WebLOAD vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about RadView WebLOAD vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process.""The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros »

"The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.""The stability is okay.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options.""Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons »

"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.""LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600.""We purchased a license for two years."

More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its licensing cost is very less.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client. That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.
Top Answer: There are still some glitches that they need to improve. We have given support feedback as well when we have some issues. They're very responsive and they do work to fix and improve issues. LoadRunner… more »
Ranking
12th
Views
2,102
Comparisons
1,036
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
597
Rating
5.5
Views
6,328
Comparisons
3,720
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
500
Rating
8.2
Comparisons
Also Known As
NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
Learn More
Radview
Video Not Available
Overview

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
Sample Customers
GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Healthcare Company29%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company5%
REVIEWERS
Retailer18%
Government18%
Computer Software Company18%
Individual & Family Service12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
Find out what your peers are saying about RadView WebLOAD vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RadView WebLOAD is ranked 12th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter, Visual Studio Test Professional and Selenium HQ, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and Tricentis Tosca. See our RadView WebLOAD vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.