Compare Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranorex Studio Logo
10,829 views|8,095 comparisons
ReadyAPI Logo
4,865 views|3,654 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.""The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.""This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.""Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

More Ranorex Studio Pros »

"The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them.""The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client.""The most valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it is user-friendly.""It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools.""A single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.""When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."

More ReadyAPI Pros »

Cons
"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.""One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.""For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.""The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

More Ranorex Studio Cons »

"I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution.""If ReadyAPI had more integration with all of the big tools on the market then this would be very useful.""Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data.""The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.""Lacking flexibility of adding more custom verification for security testing.""The reporting is not very robust and needs to be improved.""It doesn't have connectors to the NoSQL database. This is one of the things where they do not have a very solid strategy today. Other solutions have an in-built mechanism where I can directly and easily connect. An API is more around a user submitting a request on the frontend. It then hits the backend, puts the data, and responds back. If I am hitting MongoDB or NoSQL databases, I do not have ready-made inbuilt solutions in ReadyAPI that can easily help me in automating it faster. In our organization, we deal with NoSQL databases, and therefore, we need Groovy. We just cannot have a connector from ReadyAPI to do that. I have to write Groovy scripts. If you have themes that are predominantly using MongoDB, it leads to more maintenance and support activity because we are introducing more code into our commission. In terms of additional features, it can have cloud support. This is one of the things where we are getting into cloud support. We'll see how it works, but it is one of the doubts that we still have."

More ReadyAPI Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).""There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.""The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing.""The cost of a license is probably around $1,000 to $2,000. Accounting is done by my leadership. I am more into implementations and making sure all things and processes are taken care of and the frameworks are maintained and managed."

More ReadyAPI Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools.
Top Answer: The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.
Top Answer: Our primary use case of this solution is to test services to have an understanding of what the request to the service should be and the response. We also use it for performance tests.
Ranking
13th
Views
10,829
Comparisons
8,095
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
547
Avg. Rating
8.0
10th
Views
4,865
Comparisons
3,654
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
479
Avg. Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 74% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
Ready API
Learn
Ranorex
SmartBear
Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

ReadyAPI combines the power of SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, ServiceV, and API Monitoring in AlertSite into a single pane of glass. From functional testing, to performance testing to post-deployment monitoring, SmartBear’s API tools help you to deliver accurate, fast, and secure APIs.

Offer
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Learn more about ReadyAPI
Sample Customers
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, VodafoneHealthcare Data Solutions (HDS)
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Manufacturing Company19%
Financial Services Firm19%
Newspaper6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider19%
Manufacturing Company7%
Media Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise41%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise88%
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranorex Studio is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while ReadyAPI is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews. Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0, while ReadyAPI is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes " A great single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization". Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One and Selenium HQ, whereas ReadyAPI is most compared with SoapUI Pro, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, BlazeMeter and Sauce Labs. See our Ranorex Studio vs. ReadyAPI report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.