Compare Ranorex Studio vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Ranorex Studio is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Saves a lot of human resources by running full regression tests prior to each release". Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and UFT (QTP), whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, UFT (QTP) and Katalon Studio. See our Ranorex Studio vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.

Read more »

The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.

Read more »

Cons
One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.

Read more »

Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.

Read more »

The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
366,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
Views
13,448
Comparisons
9,577
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
527
Avg. Rating
8.0
6th
Views
20,130
Comparisons
13,062
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
311
Avg. Rating
8.4
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Learn
Ranorex
SmartBear
Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, VodafoneCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm21%
Manufacturing Company14%
Maritime Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Manufacturing Company18%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider8%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company13%
Retailer13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company20%
Manufacturing Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise34%
Large Enterprise39%
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email