Most Helpful Review
Use SmartBear TestLeft? Share your opinion.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance."
"It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment."
"The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks."
"Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost."
"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."
"We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future."
"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."
"Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."
"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."
"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."
"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."
Information Not Available
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that… more »
Top Answer: The licensing is yearly.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 77% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
|Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.|
Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.
|SmartBear TestLeft a functional testing tool fully embedded in standard IDEs. TestLeft is a powerful yet lean functional testing tool for dev-testers working in Agile teams. It fully embeds into standard development IDEs. A built-in access to object and method library is also available with TestLeft. Dev-testers can thereby easily and quickly create robust functional automated tests without leaving their favorite IDEs such as Visual Studio. It also works well with other tools in dev eco-systems such as source control or continuous integration systems.|
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Learn more about SmartBear TestLeft
|Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines||Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone||American Red Cross, CISCO, HONDA, ADIDAS, TBC bank|
Consumer Goods Company13%
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider7%
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm19%
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider19%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Ranorex Studio is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while SmartBear TestLeft is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0, while SmartBear TestLeft is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". On the other hand, Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One and Xamarin Test Cloud, whereas SmartBear TestLeft is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ and Tricentis Tosca.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.