Compare Ranorex Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca

Ranorex Studio is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "TOSCA Testsuite Review". Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and UFT (QTP), whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Ranorex Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranorex Studio Logo
13,026 views|9,435 comparisons
Tricentis Tosca Logo
35,851 views|14,625 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.

Read more »

The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those.It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority.Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.

Read more »

Cons
One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.

Read more »

The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows.Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation.Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.It needs better integration with JIRA.I would like a better user interface.Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.

Read more »

Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked.We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
Views
13,026
Comparisons
9,435
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
527
Avg. Rating
8.0
3rd
Views
35,851
Comparisons
14,625
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
372
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn
Ranorex
Tricentis
Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.

Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.

Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.

Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.

Offer
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
Sample Customers
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm21%
Manufacturing Company14%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Manufacturing Company11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm10%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer10%
Manufacturing Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise34%
Large Enterprise39%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email