Compare Ranorex Studio vs. UFT (QTP)

Ranorex Studio is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while UFT (QTP) is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0, while UFT (QTP) is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and UFT (QTP), whereas UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT). See our Ranorex Studio vs. UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranorex Studio Logo
13,448 views|9,577 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
25,709 views|15,689 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
365,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator.I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier.

Read more »

Cons
One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function.I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved.Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.

Read more »

For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
365,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
Views
13,448
Comparisons
9,577
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
527
Avg. Rating
8.0
2nd
Views
25,709
Comparisons
15,689
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
915
Avg. Rating
8.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Ranorex
Micro Focus
Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Learn More About UFT

Fill out the form to view the report

Sample Customers
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm21%
Manufacturing Company14%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company22%
Manufacturing Company19%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm17%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise34%
Large Enterprise39%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
365,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email