Compare Ranorex Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Ranorex Studio is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and UFT (QTP), whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with LoadRunner, Katalon Studio and Apache JMeter. See our Ranorex Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Visual Studio Test Professional? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.

Read more »

Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software.We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available.

Read more »

Cons
One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.

Read more »

Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement.The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.

Read more »

For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
378,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
Views
13,026
Comparisons
9,435
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
527
Avg. Rating
8.0
14th
Views
4,647
Comparisons
3,763
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
610
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Learn
Ranorex
Microsoft
Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Offer
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, VodafoneTransport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm21%
Manufacturing Company14%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Manufacturing Company11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm10%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email