Ranorex vs UFT (QTP)

Ranorex is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews vs UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 23 reviews. The top reviewer of Ranorex writes "Automation coverage overnight is very useful, although it needs to have modularity". The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Ranorex is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, UFT (QTP) and froglogic Squish. UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Worksoft Certify. See our Ranorex vs UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ranorex vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,013 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Ranorex vs UFT (QTP)

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator.I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier.The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation.

Read more »

Cons
Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls).

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function.I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved.Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.It doesn’t support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this.You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.The licensing and pricing model is confusing.It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly.

Read more »

Ranorex vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,013 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
18,354
Comparisons
9,397
Reviews
2
Followers
1,121
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
40,767
Comparisons
21,900
Reviews
23
Followers
2,363
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Smartbear%20software logo
Compared 26% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 15% of the time.
Ilpgg6an 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Ranorex competitors »
Tricentislogo
Compared 19% of the time.
Smartbear%20software logo
Compared 14% of the time.
Worksoft twitter logo reasonably small
Compared 9% of the time.
See more UFT (QTP) competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Website/Video
Website/VideoRanorex
  • Vendor 29572 screenshot 1524959476
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

OFFER
Learn more about Ranorex
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersSiemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
50%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Media Company
11%
Insurance Company
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
17%
Software R&D Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Insurance Company
8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
31%
Insurance Company
19%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Retailer
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
44%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Pharma/Biotech Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
12%
Midsize Enterprise
42%
Large Enterprise
45%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
10%
Midsize Enterprise
22%
Large Enterprise
67%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
7%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
82%
Ranorex vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
270,013 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email