Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have.
For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature.
It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have.
Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops.
The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution.
The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment.
Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick.
We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why.
The most important aspect of the solution is that it rarely gives false positives, especially compared to other products. It provides very clear reports for our IT teams to look at.
This solution is very easy to use and easy to install.
It's easy to use. It's fast, it's a powerful easy to access tool.
There are many integrations with things like the VMware NSX that are great, the reporting is really solid.
The most valuable feature is the site scanning, where we can provide a complete subnet and what it is we need to scan on those devices.
We feel the interface is very good. It is very easy to use, even a nontechnical person can use it.
The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides.
Rapid7 InsightVM has given us a practical view of the vulnerabilities present in our organization.
Nessus gives me a good preview of vulnerabilities and good suggestions for remediation. It's easy to find a description of a given vulnerability and solutions for it.
The most valuable feature is how it scanned and detected through its database to let us know exactly what fixes we needed to put in place for the vulnerabilities. It detects and it also gives you the way to fix it.
Among the most valuable features are scanning for vulnerabilities and the reporting. The reporting templates are okay. I like that I can see all the hosts with different vulnerabilities.
The most valuable feature is the breadth of vulnerabilities that it finds. It's able to find across a lot of different platforms and operating systems. It's also able to combine local testing with network-based testing.
Nessus is good at finding out what nodes you have in place. It will then provide you a report, by node, of what the vulnerabilities are. It does it quickly and stealthfully.
It also has an executive report where you don't have to provide the client all the detail for them to sift though. But if they wish to dig through the detail they can.
The solution is very stable.
I find the features that are most valuable are the policies that help us identify the vulnerabilities. These policies are then used for scanning instabilities and then identifying the particular vulnerabilities.
We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic.
The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans.
When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic.
Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS.
In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us.
It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched.
You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing.
We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version.
There needs to be much clearer instructions surrounding scanning.
It would be nice to have an additional feature that would provide reports on who has logged onto the console or who did what on the console.
The InsightVM cannot scan if we connect to our customer by the VPN.
Some difficulties with the online reporting and lack of integrations.
The reporting is a little bit tricky because it can be difficult to exactly pinpoint some of the assets to filter them and generate a report.
The reporting has room for improvement. You cannot customize any report. If I need a specific requirement, I have to create a new report for it.
This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider.
A definite improvement would be to make it easier to run ad-hoc scans without needing to assign the asset to a site or group.
One area that has room for improvement is the reporting. I'm preparing reports for Windows and Linux machines, etc. Currently, I'm collecting three or four reports and turning them into one report. I don't know if it is possible to combine all of them in one report, but that would be helpful.
There is room, overall, for improvement in the way it groups the workstations and the way it detects, when the vulnerability is scanned. Even when we would run a new scan, if it was an already existing vulnerability, it wouldn't put a new date on it.
We use credentialed scans. They need more permissions and more changes or settings on Windows and Linux.
There is room for improvement in finishing the transition to the cloud. We'd like to see them keep on improving the Tenable.io product, so that we can migrate to it entirely, instead of having to keep the Tenable.sc on-prem product.
One area with room for improvement is instead of there just being a PDF format for output, I'd like the option of an Excel spreadsheet, whereby I could better track remediation efforts and provide reporting off of that.
I would like to see an improvement in the ranking of high, medium and low vulnerability.
We have had some false positives in the past, which we hope can improve in the future.
This is still a maturing product. Tenable is only a scanner for one ability, while other solutions like Rapid7 have more tools for verification. We still have to manually verify to see if the vulnerability is a false positive or not.
Pricing and Cost Advice
The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.
All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio.
The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable.
When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted.
Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.
Our licensing costs are somewhere around $40,000 annually. There are no additional fees.
The license is IP based. How many IPs you are using to scan is the amount of the license you have to buy. The number of users doesn't matter; many users can use it or only person. It depends on the culture of the organization.
This solution is expensive, but it's fine for us as we have an open budget for security solutions. Protection and having the system secured is more important.
The price of the solution is less than the competitors.
I do not have experience with the pricing of the solution.
I think the price is fairly affordable. It provides a license that is fair.
The price of Tenable Nessus is much more competitive versus other solutions on the market.
The pricing is much more manageable versus other products.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
|Acunetix||Rapid7||Tenable Network Security|
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Rapid7 InsightVM is the vulnerability assessment tool built for the modern web. InsightVM combines complete ecosystem visibility, an unparalleled understanding of the attacker mindset, and the agility of SecOps so you can act before impact.
Nessus Professional is the industry’s most widely deployed assessment solution for identifying the vulnerabilities, configuration issues, and malware that attackers use to penetrate your, or your customer's network. With the broadest coverage, the latest intelligence, rapid updates, and an easy-to-use interface, Nessus offers an effective and comprehensive vulnerability scanning package for one low cost.
Learn more about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner
Learn more about Rapid7 InsightVM
Learn more about Tenable Nessus
|Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand||ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM||Bitbrains, Tesla, Just Eat, Crosskey Banking Solutions, Covenant Health, Youngstown State University|
Financial Services Firm38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm29%
Comms Service Provider14%
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Comms Service Provider11%
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.