We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ReadyAPI's best features are user-friendliness, smooth integration with Postman, the speed of creating test cases, and integration with customer data."
"Reporting is more robust than other products because test reports can be exported in multiple ways."
"It's easy to implement."
"The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are the ready-to-use assertions and filters which can perform the validation. If we want to filter out any value, the filters are available. Apart from that database integration, if you want to go ahead and perform validation in the database layer it is possible with the ready-to-use feature available. The execution and reporting are rich features."
"The most valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are its robust functionality and collaboration capabilities."
"I haven't seen any other tool that offers both types of tests. This is very helpful for us, and it's one of the main reasons why we chose this service."
"The most valuable feature has been the assertion as a test step as this has allowed us to increase the scope of testing and validation."
"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."
"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"As a codeless automation tool, the product offers a user-friendly experience without requiring extensive coding knowledge. Users can easily handle various applications, including web applications, SAP applications, Windows applications, and even Salesforce applications, without manual coding."
"Software testing tool that has multiple features. It's good to use for SAP testing, and it helps reduce test execution time."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"The low code is the best feature."
"If ReadyAPI had more integration with all of the big tools on the market then this would be very useful."
"It is challenging doing upgrades and patches because sometimes the environmental variables or suits in the projects get erased."
"It doesn't have connectors to the NoSQL database. This is one of the things where they do not have a very solid strategy today. Other solutions have an in-built mechanism where I can directly and easily connect. An API is more around a user submitting a request on the frontend. It then hits the backend, puts the data, and responds back. If I am hitting MongoDB or NoSQL databases, I do not have ready-made inbuilt solutions in ReadyAPI that can easily help me in automating it faster. In our organization, we deal with NoSQL databases, and therefore, we need Groovy. We just cannot have a connector from ReadyAPI to do that. I have to write Groovy scripts. If you have themes that are predominantly using MongoDB, it leads to more maintenance and support activity because we are introducing more code into our commission. In terms of additional features, it can have cloud support. This is one of the things where we are getting into cloud support. We'll see how it works, but it is one of the doubts that we still have."
"Version control does not work well."
"I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution."
"Many users will consider this solution expensive compared to the layout. It is more expensive than other solutions."
"The UI is not user-friendly."
"The overall scope of this solution is limited and could be improved."
"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."
"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."
"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."
"Tricentis Tosca currently does not support any mobile testing and can be improved."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."
"It would be of great help if they can fix the loading or performance issues. Sometimes, when I create the test case folder and test cases, it feels like it has loading or performance issues. When passing the objects, we can't sometimes find the exact element. We need to find out that exact location and just give the path for that, and then it works. In the pipeline, when creating Jenkins, we create the list execution for passing the execution list to the commander. I feel it is a bit late, by a fraction of seconds. I first thought it could be my mistake or a setting issue, but I worked on that, and it's not a mistake or a setting issue."
"Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us."
ReadyAPI is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 33 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 96 reviews. ReadyAPI is rated 7.6, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, ReadyAPI Test, SmartBear TestComplete and Parasoft SOAtest, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete. See our ReadyAPI vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
