Reblaze vs StackPath WAF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Reblaze Logo
460 views|344 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
StackPath Logo
216 views|163 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Reblaze and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Francesco MariaCompagnucci
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Reblaze knows how to manage security. For me as, someone who knows little about security, it's good that I have a firm that optimizes everything according to their standards. It's their responsibility and they are fully hands-on.""I very much like the elastic search and reports, allowing us to have a 360-degree view of the customer's activities and enabling us to track down any suspicious bots.""The feature I find most valuable is the user-friendly dashboard. It is easy to understand how everything works and it allows you to make decisions quickly and efficiently.""The most valuable features were the real-time monitoring and the management. With this kind of product, you need a very good management system to allow you to see false positives in real-time; to see what's happening in real-time... The clarity stood out. It was very visible and very easy to navigate; very easy to find the data we were looking for.""The best thing about Reblaze, for us, is that it has been a game changer because previously, we were using Google's Web Application Firewall, but it wasn't up to the mark.""Provides mobile app security.""We like the website protection. It's really good. The dashboard is really simple to use.""The real-time monitoring and reporting are very good. There are information updates in their portal every two minutes. They also have the ability to spill it into Sumo Logic, for example. It's very easy to use."

More Reblaze Pros →

"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."

More StackPath WAF Pros →

Cons
"Some of the settings on the dashboard are confusing.""The next release should have next-generation automation.""I would like to have seen more automated reports. Maybe it has been improved in the last year and I'm just not aware of it. But from a managerial point of view, you want a summary report, a weekly report: How many attacks were blocked? How much bandwidth was saved due to the caching mechanism? What were the top-ten attacks that were tested on the network, etc? I could most likely have found all that data if I logged in to the system and ran different reports. It would be very helpful to get a management report on a weekly basis.""The WAF features are not as granular as we would expect from a WAF system. There should be more granularity and in-depth rules, out-of-the-box.""Up to now the only cons I could find is sometimes getting change management back on track, because it's a company that evolves, and sometimes I don't have the same needs that they have. But besides that, up until now, I am really pleased with their service and I've also recommended them to some of my clients.""We have multiple products behind different instances of Reblaze. We have one instance for staging and then we have a production instance for multiple products. One of the things that we have requested is a unified view panel, so that we can see each of the instances in a unified view. That way, we won't have to go bouncing from instance to instance.""It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level requirements.""They have an interface that you have to adjust to. That is a bit of a downfall because I expect an interface to be very intuitive for someone who knows little about security. But if you know about security, the interface is wonderful."

More Reblaze Cons →

"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."

More StackPath WAF Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "On a monthly basis we pay $750."
  • "I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."
  • "There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."
  • "We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."
  • More Reblaze Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease.
    Top Answer:We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration. It is worth mentioning that these figures might not be current… more »
    Top Answer:There is a potential improvement regarding simplifying the complexity of rule creation. It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level… more »
    Top Answer:The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites.
    Top Answer:The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement. It could provide high security to handle large traffic volumes for multiple websites.
    Ranking
    Views
    460
    Comparisons
    344
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,144
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    216
    Comparisons
    163
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    263
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Cloudflare logo
    Compared 47% of the time.
    Imperva DDoS logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    F5 Advanced WAF logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Radware Alteon logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    AWS WAF logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Also Known As
    StackPath Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    StackPath
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Reblaze is a cloud-based, fully managed protective shield for sites and web applications. Hostile traffic is blocked in the cloud, before it reaches the protected network.

    Reblaze is a comprehensive web security solution, providing a next-gen WAF, DoS and DDoS protection, bot mitigation, scraping prevention, CDN, load balancing, and more.

    The platform offers a unique combination of benefits. Machine learning provides accurate, adaptive threat detection. Dedicated Virtual Private Clouds ensure maximum privacy. Top-tier infrastructure assures maximum performance. Fine-grained ACLs enable precise traffic regulation. An intuitive web-based management console provides real-time traffic control. A one-month trial offer allows you to assess Reblaze with no cost, risk, or obligation.

    Reblaze makes it effortless and affordable to secure and accelerate your web assets. Organizations from many vertical markets around the globe are benefiting from Reblaze's highly scalable WAF/IDS, DDoS, anti-scraping and Bot mitigation service.

    StackPath WAF integrates multiple technologies, including Advanced Browser Validation and IP Reputation and Custom Rules engines, into an intelligent firewall that can be customized to meet your specific protection profile.

    Sample Customers
    eBay, AirAsia, Taboola, Reebonz, IAI, Payoneer, mySupermarket, William Hill, Fanduel
    Robotics Cats, Jewlr
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Media Company9%
    Construction Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise45%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Reblaze is ranked 23rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Reblaze is rated 8.8, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Reblaze writes "Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". Reblaze is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, F5 Advanced WAF, Radware Alteon and AWS WAF, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri and AWS WAF.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.