Compare Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs. Snyk

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Snyk, Mirantis and others in Container Security. Updated: July 2021.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website.""We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon""You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it.""Their licensing model is fairly robust and scalable for our needs. I believe we have reached a reasonable agreement on the licensing to enable hundreds of developers to participate in this product offering. The solution is very tailored towards developers and its licensing model works well for us.""The price is good. Snyk had a good price compared to the competition, who had higher pricing than them. Also, their licensing and billing are clear.""It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value.""With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us.""Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium."

More Snyk Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It is easy for developers to use. The documentation is clear as well as the APIs are good and easily readable. It's a good solution overall.
Top Answer: We would like to have upfront knowledge on how easy it should be to just pull in an upgraded dependency, e.g., even introduce full automation for dependencies supposed to have no impact on the… more »
Top Answer: We have been considering Snyk in order to improve the security of our platform, in terms of Docker image security as well as software dependency security. Ultimately, we decided to roll out only the… more »
Ranking
12th
out of 24 in Container Security
Views
1,967
Comparisons
1,657
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 24 in Container Security
Views
15,398
Comparisons
11,907
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
1,668
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
StackRox
Learn More
Red Hat
Video Not Available
Overview

Powered by deep integrations with Kubernetes, Red Hat® Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (RHACS) is an enterprise-ready, Kubernetes-native container security solution that enables you to securely build, deploy, and run cloud-native applications anywhere

Snyk’s mission is to help developers use open source code and stay secure. The use of open source is booming, but security is a key concern (https://snyk.io/stateofossecurity/). Snyk’s unique developer focused product enables developers and enterprise security to continuously find & fix vulnerable dependencies without slowing down, with seamless integration into Dev & DevOps workflows. Snyk is adopted by over 100,000 developers, has multiple enterprise customers (such as Google, New Relic, ASOS and others) and is experiencing rapid growth. Our investors are Canaan Partners, BOLDStart, and several successful developer tools entrepreneurs. Snyk was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in London with offices in Israel and the US. For more information, go to https://snyk.io/.

Offer
Learn more about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Learn more about Snyk
Sample Customers
City National Bank, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm8%
Media Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise28%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise56%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Snyk, Mirantis and others in Container Security. Updated: July 2021.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is ranked 12th in Container Security while Snyk is ranked 2nd in Container Security with 18 reviews. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is rated 0.0, while Snyk is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snyk writes "Helps Avoid The Pain And The Cost Of Trying To Retrofit Security in your Code". Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Sysdig Secure, Aqua Security, Tigera and Tenable.io Container Security, whereas Snyk is most compared with WhiteSource, SonarQube, Black Duck, Checkmarx and JFrog Xray.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.