Red Hat AMQ vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat AMQ and Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
MichaelSukachev
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability.""AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.""Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability.""The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day.""The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched.""The most valuable feature is stability.""This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

More Red Hat AMQ Pros →

"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Pros →

Cons
"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general.""Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration.""There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering.""There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated.""There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly.""The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow.""AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

More Red Hat AMQ Cons →

"JBoss could add more automation."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."
  • "This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."
  • "The solution is open-source."
  • "Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."
  • More Red Hat AMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.
    Top Answer:AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools.
    Top Answer:We use AMQ's event-driven architecture to exchange messages, and I can connect the AMQ Broker through various integrations.
    Top Answer:JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.
    Top Answer:JBoss could add more automation.
    Top Answer:We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,534
    Comparisons
    3,897
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    268
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    124
    Comparisons
    107
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    172
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

    Sample Customers
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Red Hat AMQ is ranked 8th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.2, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "A stable, open-source technology, with a convenient deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and IBM Event Streams, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with IBM MQ and Apache Kafka.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.