We performed a comparison between Red Hat AMQ and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."
"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."
"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."
"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."
"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"The solution can scale."
"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."
"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."
"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."
"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."
"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."
"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."
"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."
"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"The availability could be better."
"The user interface could be improved."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
Red Hat AMQ is ranked 8th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 38 reviews. Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.2, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "A stable, open-source technology, with a convenient deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, IBM Event Streams and Amazon MQ, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker. See our Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
