Red Hat Data Grid vs ScyllaDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
213 views|174 comparisons
ScyllaDB Logo
2,445 views|1,490 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat Data Grid and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Red Hat Data Grid?
Pranv Kumar
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."
  • More ScyllaDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively.
    Top Answer:I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive.
    Top Answer:It has just been a month or so for me with Scylla. The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved. Improvement of documentation is needed considering that I work… more »
    Ranking
    16th
    out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    213
    Comparisons
    174
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    2,445
    Comparisons
    1,490
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 40% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Apache HBase logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    InfluxDB logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Learn More
    Red Hat
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Red Hat Data Grid is an in-memory key-value data store, similar to a NoSQL database, and can be used by applications as their primary data store for rapid access to in-memory data, although data may also be persisted for recovery, backup, and archiving.

    ScyllaDB is an open-source, distributed NoSQL wide-column datastore (a highly scalable NoSQL database), known for its compatibility with Apache Cassandra, and for supporting the same protocols as Cassandra (CQL and Thrift) and the same file formats (SSTable). ScyllaDB is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for data-intensive applications. Its architecture allows it to deliver remarkable performance on a massive scale, utilizing modern multi-core servers to their fullest potential​

    ScyllaDB utilizes a similar architecture, data format, and query language as Apache Cassandra, providing compatibility while dramatically improving speed and scalability.

    The key advantages of ScyllaDB include its rewritten C++ implementation that eliminates Cassandra's expensive Java garbage collection pauses, built-in caching for fast access to frequently used data, and shard-aware drivers for direct routing of requests. This enables it to fully leverage modern multi-core servers for massive parallelism. The community is active and the latest major release, ScyllaDB Enterprise 2023.1.0 LTS, incorporates over 5,000 code commits focused on enhancing capabilities.

    ScyllaDB supports wide-column data modeling for fast read performance at scale. It includes integrated monitoring and management tools to track database health and performance. For organizations looking to boost speed and reduce costs for NoSQL workloads, ScyllaDB offers a drop-in replacement for Cassandra that delivers lower latency, higher throughput, and increased scalability with fewer nodes. Its seamless migration path makes switching from Cassandra seamless, requiring minimal code changes.

    Sample Customers
    TTTECH, Thai bank
    IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Educational Organization7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Red Hat Data Grid is ranked 16th in NoSQL Databases while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Red Hat Data Grid is rated 0.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Red Hat Data Grid is most compared with MongoDB and Cassandra, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Apache HBase, Couchbase and InfluxDB.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.