We performed a comparison between Red Hat Fuse and Sopera Advanced Service Factory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The most valuable feature is the software development environment."
"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."
"The initial setup process is quite straightforward."
"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."
"The most valuable part of Fuse is the fact that it's based on Red Hat Apache Camel. It is really good that it already comes with so many different connectors. That makes it relatively easy to use. We use their XML definition to define the routes, making it really easy to define the routing."
"We use it because it is easy to integrate with any other application...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution nine out of ten."
"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. We are an enterprise business."
"The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful."
"I have found the best feature are the administrative controls."
"I don't know the product last versions. I know they are migrating a microservices concepts. We still didn't get there... but we are in the process."
"Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."
"What could be improved in Red Hat Fuse is the deployment process because it's still very heavy. It's containerized, but now with Spring Boot and other microservices-related containers, deployment is still very heavy. Red Hat Fuse still has room for improvement in terms of becoming more containerized and more oriented."
"Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications."
"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."
"My company doesn't have any experience with other messaging tools, so it's difficult to mention what areas could be improved in Red Hat Fuse, but it could be pricing because I find it expensive."
"The solution will be discontinued in 2024."
"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."
"This solution is running on the Eclipse platform and this is where all the designing takes place. The Eclipse performance should be improved. The Open Studio tool we have been using for the development is not up to the industry standard and the performance should be improved."
More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is ranked 18th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2, while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sopera Advanced Service Factory writes "Functional administrative controls, highly scalable, and reliable". Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and JBoss ESB, whereas Sopera Advanced Service Factory is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
