We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Red Hat Fuse vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Fuse vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the software development environment.""We usually had used PowerCenter for master data integration (by replication). But in some cases, it was better to use Fuse for providing the master data online. It doesn't make it necessary to replicate data.""The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."

More Red Hat Fuse Pros »

"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use.""The solution is very stable.""The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based.""The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development.""It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product.""The technology is really easy to learn."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Pros »

Cons
"Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly.""I don't know the product last versions. I know they are migrating a microservices concepts. We still didn't get there... but we are in the process.""Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."

More Red Hat Fuse Cons »

"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager.""If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs.""Our version does not have cloud capabilities.""The stability of their latest version is not on par with their classic version 5.X.""The intermediate version that we are using has stability issues. These stability issues should be resolved, but it seems like TIBCO is not focusing on resolving these issues. The resolution timelines are quite high even for high-priority incidents. Its price should be lower. Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs.""Issues with the support, the fees, and the termination of the professional services are reasons we are looking for other solutions."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

More Red Hat Fuse Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features.""Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs.""The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default… more »
Top Answer: In terms of price, it depends on the package the client signs.
Top Answer: Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible.
Top Answer: It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product.
Top Answer: Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs.
Top Answer: The intermediate version that we are using has stability issues. These stability issues should be resolved, but it seems like TIBCO is not focusing on resolving these issues. The resolution timelines… more »
Ranking
Views
6,610
Comparisons
4,158
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
566
Rating
7.7
Views
2,925
Comparisons
2,078
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
618
Rating
8.3
Comparisons
Also Known As
Fuse ESB, FuseSource
ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Learn More
Overview

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.
Offer
Learn more about Red Hat Fuse
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Sample Customers
Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Colonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Fuse vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Red Hat Fuse is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 3 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 6 reviews. Red Hat Fuse is rated 7.6, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Default settings are enough to handle most requirements, but needs more flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus writes "Easy to use, performs well, and it's the best platform in terms of speed". Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and webMethods Integration Server, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and IBM DataPower Gateway. See our Red Hat Fuse vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.