Compare Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I found it was quite easy to set up and implement.""The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable.""The most valuable feature is the software development environment."

More Red Hat Fuse Pros »

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).""We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.""A product with good API and EDI components.""All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
"The web tools need to be updated.""The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower.""Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly."

More Red Hat Fuse Cons »

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.""We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.""The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.""The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.""Technical support is an area where they can improve.""I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We found other solutions were more costly.""This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

More Red Hat Fuse Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.""It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.""The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.""The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.""This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: If I choose the standalone installation, what is the best configuration: with Spring Boot or with JBoss EAP?
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
6th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
6,696
Comparisons
4,470
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
462
Avg. Rating
8.7
3rd
out of 24 in ESB
Views
17,016
Comparisons
11,687
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
417
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Fuse ESB, FuseSource
Learn
Red Hat
Software AG
Overview

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Red Hat Fuse
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADEFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company21%
Insurance Company14%
Computer Software Company14%
Manufacturing Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company7%
Retailer5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Red Hat Fuse is ranked 6th in ESB with 3 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB with 7 reviews. Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Competitive with good technical qualities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, Oracle Service Bus and JBoss ESB, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, SAP Process Orchestration and Camunda BPM. See our Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods Integration Server report.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.