Compare Red Hat Gluster Storage vs. StarWind HyperConverged Appliance

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Red Hat Gluster Storage? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, DataCore and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: October 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It's very easy to upgrade storage."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Pros »

"We no longer need multiple staff members performing small, mundane tasks.""The initial setup is straightforward once you know what you're doing.""The biggest thing we were looking for was redundancy, with both the compute and the storage, so that way we could lose a full node and still keep everything up and running, and not have to worry about it... StarWind was able to provide a solution for what we wanted, - to provide for redundancy.""High-availability is what I bought it for.""The hardware footprint is perfect. It fits in our rack perfectly, and we were able to condense a lot of physical servers we had. It has greatly eliminated the excess stuff in our server rack...""We have the ProActive Premium Support and it has reduced our monitoring efforts. It has been very useful. They have been able to detect things such as when there's an issue with the cluster or they're getting some kind of weird reading that I have no idea about. They're really quick to let me know about it and even set up a schedule to address it. I've been very happy with their level of support on that.""The software is great. It's very easy to understand. I've not delved into any of the command-line stuff, but there's no real need to script it. Since it went in, pretty much the only thing that I have needed to do is increase device image sizes and that process is very straightforward.""Overall, the solution has improved our system's performance. I was concerned about the physical-to-virtual conversion of our database server. It's actually much faster now, as a virtualized host on this Hyper-V cluster."

More StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Pros »

Cons
"The user interface could be simplified."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Cons »

"The only thing my team has recommended improving on is possibly a StarWind-customized GUI to monitor the overall system health, similar to 5nine Manager.""This product is not one hundred percent enterprise-ready, so it is more suitable for SMB.""We haven't had to use the ProActive Premium Support feature much yet. But they contacted me one time because there was a glitch on one server, a networking issue... I have not seen the problem since.""The only thing I have run into is that I did want to add more hard drives into the host, so that we could look at doing a RAID 10, and the hard drive prices were pretty expensive... that's pretty nit-picky and I don't think it has anything to do with StarWind itself. I think it's more on whomever they work with for their hardware.""I wish I understood what goes into the StarWind software a little bit better. To me, it's kind of magic the way some of it works. As an IT professional, you don't really want things to be magic. I do wish there was a little more "Here's how it works." There could be more documentation given to administrators...""We were slightly disappointed with the hardware footprint. We were led to believe, and all the pre-sales tech information requirements pointed to the fact, that it was coming on Dell hardware. Then it came on bulk servers.""The only critique I might have is that the support is overseas in Eastern Europe and, on occasion, there has been a language issue. But in general, they're as good as can be...""At the moment, the initial configuration is very technical and error-prone. That is the reason Starwind does it for you as a service, which is a great thing. But it would be nice if we could change or rearrange storage assignments ourselves."

More StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"This was all completed at an affordable price point for an SMB, which was also a key element for an NPO.""When I researched they came the most cost-effective.""The other solutions we were looking at were priced much higher than this and they didn't necessarily have full redundancy... Nutanix and VxRail were in the final running... but it came down to our price point.""I honestly feel that there's no one else in the market doing what they're doing for the price point that they're doing it at. That's why I asked them about investing in their company. I think that the options they're providing and the software that they have is sort of revolutionary for the price point... The total cost was $24,400.""The Nutanix piece was about $45,000, getting close to $50,000 with all the licensing involved, whereas the StarWind was less than half of that, after Microsoft licensing and such.""We looked at Nutanix and found it did almost the same thing but for more money. In fact, StarWind was nearly one-third of the price; it cost us £36,000. That includes five years of monitoring... The Nutanix was near enough £110,000 for relatively the same amount of performance and storage.""Our entire package was around $35,000 for everything, including three years of support.""There is a bit of a start-up cost. Having never used HCAs before, I was reluctant to buy it. I would suggest that you jump in and do it, as I wish I hadn't wasted so much time."

More StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It's very easy to upgrade storage.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, my initial suggestion would be that the user interface could be simplified. For now, it requires training to be able to use it. I would like to see a more simplified version… more »
Top Answer: We're using the product for storage.
Top Answer: In our experience with StarWind, the support has been by far the most valuable feature.
Top Answer: Regarding licensing fees, the caveat is that with the Windows-based OS, we have to pay for that licensing for both hosts. That's is another reason I wanted Linux. As for VMware, we already had VMware… more »
Top Answer: When we purchased the StarWind HyperConverged Appliances, they shipped with the Windows-based vSAN solution. Since then, they have released vSAN for vSphere, which is based on a Linux VM and would… more »
Ranking
Views
5,689
Comparisons
4,255
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
242
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
3,138
Comparisons
663
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
1,321
Avg. Rating
9.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
Learn
Red Hat
StarWind
Overview

Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

For SMB, ROBO and Enterprises, who look to bring in quick deployment and operation simplicity to virtualization workloads and reduce related expenses, our solution is StarWind HyperConverged Appliance (HCA). It unifies commodity servers, disks and flash, hypervisor of choice, StarWind Virtual SAN, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct or VMware Virtual SAN and associated software into a single manageable layer. The HCA supports scale-up by adding disks and flash, and scale-out by adding extra nodes.

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance consists of StarWind Virtual SAN, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct or VMware Virtual SAN “Ready Nodes”, targeting those, who are building their virtualization infrastructure from scratch. In case there is an existing set of servers, we offer a “software only version”, which is essentially our years proven StarWind Virtual SAN. Basically, it’s the fuel powering StarWind HCA. 

Offer
Learn more about Red Hat Gluster Storage
Learn more about StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
Sample Customers
NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, CasioSears Home and Franchise Business
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider18%
Retailer5%
Manufacturing Company4%
REVIEWERS
Construction Company19%
Transportation Company19%
Healthcare Company13%
K 12 Educational Company Or School13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company18%
Government6%
Real Estate/Law Firm4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, DataCore and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: October 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Red Hat Gluster Storage is ranked 16th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review while StarWind HyperConverged Appliance is ranked 3rd in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 20 reviews. Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 7.0, while StarWind HyperConverged Appliance is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "Easy to upgrade but the interface should be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StarWind HyperConverged Appliance writes "Because it's all built into one box, they could offer us the majority of the functionality we wanted, affordably". Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale, Red Hat Ceph Storage, LizardFS and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, whereas StarWind HyperConverged Appliance is most compared with Nutanix Acropolis AOS, VxRail, DataCore SANsymphony SDS, HPE SimpliVity and VMware vSAN.

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.