Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS vs VMware RabbitMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
122 views|105 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
6,393 views|5,554 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Pros →

"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols.""The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable.""Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room.""The solution can scale.""It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily.""The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible.""After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard.""Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"

More VMware RabbitMQ Pros →

Cons
"JBoss could add more automation."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Cons →

"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic.""They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great.""The user interface could be improved.""The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness.""VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand.""The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage.""I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc.""There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."

More VMware RabbitMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • "are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
  • "The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
  • "The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
  • "It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
  • "It is an open-source product."
  • More VMware RabbitMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.
    Top Answer:JBoss could add more automation.
    Top Answer:We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.
    Top Answer:IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocols… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure.
    Ranking
    Views
    122
    Comparisons
    105
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    172
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    6,393
    Comparisons
    5,554
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

    RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.

    Sample Customers
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Retailer17%
    University11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 38 reviews. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with IBM MQ and Apache Kafka, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.