• Home
  • RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs. webMethods ActiveTransfer

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs webMethods ActiveTransfer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] and webMethods ActiveTransfer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We use it for on-premises hosting of web applications.
The deployment speed has been increased. We get accurate results when copying data.
Michele Illiano
Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

    • More webMethods ActiveTransfer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about webMethods ActiveTransfer?
    Top Answer:The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for webMethods Active...
    Top Answer:The licensing depends on the type of customer, so I would refrain from talking about it in an absolute kind of way. Overall, it's somewhat expensive, and depending on customer requirements, there are… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with webMethods ActiveTransfer?
    Top Answer:I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    17th
    out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    318
    Comparisons
    115
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,311
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    RepliWeb
    Video Not Available
    Software AG
    Overview
    Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.

    WHY ACTIVETRANSFER FOR MFT?
    Imagine the simplicity of having a centralized console to easily manage partner files throughout your organization. That’s what you can do with webMethods ActiveTransfer for Managed File Transfer (MFT).

    Using this secure, reliable, centrally managed file transfer system, you can:

    -Exchange and schedule files of any size—even big data files—up to 25 times faster
    -Centrally manage file transfers, set up transfer schedules and configure users
    -Move large files quickly over long distances to increase partner response time
    -Securely exchange files with partners using the latest security and encryption techniques
    -Accelerate large file transfers by boosting performance 10 to 25 times, overcoming network
    latency and boosting productivity
    -Control transfer speeds and allocate necessary, network bandwidth to partners
    -Ensure acceptance of file transfers from approved IP addresses and assigned users
    -Schedule and create event-driven transfers
    -Trigger file transfers as the events occurs, such as completion of a batch job

    Sample Customers
    Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
    Information Not Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while webMethods ActiveTransfer is ranked 17th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 2 reviews. RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 8.2, while webMethods ActiveTransfer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] writes "Website code can be done by application owners". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods ActiveTransfer writes "It lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it". RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with , whereas webMethods ActiveTransfer is most compared with Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer and Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.